Throughout May, the People Team joins your Thursday meeting for 1–1.5 hours to cover a practical topic that helps you lead better, build stronger teams, and grow performance. This series is called The May Method — and it's built for Studio Managers who want real tools, not theory.
Your hands-on workspace for the SWTHZ Recruiting Training. Answers save to your device automatically — no login, no cloud.
Before you write one interview question, you need to know what "great" looks like. Every SWTHZ role has 3-4 core competencies. These are the behaviors that separate a great hire from a costly miss.
One Interviewer (use the question reference below). One Candidate (picks a persona). One Observer (scores alongside, leads debrief).
SA with 11 months tenure applied for ASM. Scores: Guest Connection — 4 · Sales Execution — 3 · Team Coaching — 2 · Operational Ownership — 2. Average: 2.75. You selected an external who averaged 3.5. This conversation happens before their next shift.
Never ask — ask this instead
| Never ask | Ask instead |
|---|---|
| Kids / family plans | "Can you work evenings, weekends, and holidays?" |
| Age | "Our path is 12-18 months — does that align with where you're headed?" |
| Injuries / disability | "This requires standing, bending, lifting 50 lbs — can you perform with or without accommodation?" |
| Religion | "Our shifts include Sundays — can you commit to that schedule?" |
| Country of origin | "Are you authorized to work in the US?" |
Sales Associate (4 competencies)
Studio Cleaner (3 competencies)
Assistant Studio Manager (4 competencies)
Sales Associate
| 🟩 Green | 🟡 Yellow | 🔴 Red |
|---|---|---|
| Names specific member relationships | Talks about "we" without "I" stories | Never held a job more than 6 months |
| Has used wellness/contrast therapy personally | Vague on how they close a sale | Blames all turnover on management |
| Proactively describes what they'd improve | Needs a lot of structure to stay busy | Can't name a single metric they owned |
Studio Cleaner
| 🟩 Green | 🟡 Yellow | 🔴 Red |
|---|---|---|
| Describes system or checklist they created | Only meets standard — never exceeds it | Frustrated by repetitive work |
| Has a "before guest arrives" mindset | Doesn't flag problems, just fixes quietly | Doesn't understand why speed matters |
| Takes obvious pride in clean work | Has never worked in a premium setting | Guest-facing role makes them uncomfortable |
ASM
| 🟩 Green | 🟡 Yellow | 🔴 Red |
|---|---|---|
| Names a team member they helped grow | Strong operator but avoids feedback convos | Sees leadership as authority not service |
| Has de-escalated a tough guest situation | Runs ops well only when SM is present | Can't describe a time they were wrong |
| Managed up when something needed to change | Team likes them — but won't correct them | Wants title, not the coaching responsibility |
| Move type | Tenure required | Who approves exception |
|---|---|---|
| Lateral | 6 months | Regional Manager |
| Step up to ASM | 12 months | Regional Manager |
| Step up to SM | 18 months | VP of People |
Good standing = no active PIPs/write-ups in 90 days + attendance standard + SM endorsement. Same interview guide and 1-4 scorecard as external. Every internal candidate receives structured feedback regardless of outcome.
The 4-part framework
What NOT to say: "It was really close" (vague). "Just keep doing what you're doing" (not actionable). "The other candidate was just more experienced" (dodges the real gap).
Shadow every role, learn the brand promise, complete required training. Goal: guest-ready solo.
First solo opening/closing. First 1:1 with SM. First self-assessment against competencies.
Performance baseline set. First formal review. Path conversation for growth. Strengths and gaps named clearly.
The research is clear: the commitment you name out loud is 3x more likely to happen than one you just think about. Pick one thing. Make it specific. Make it this week.
| 🔓 Feedback | 🌿 Coaching | |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Past behavior | Future growth |
| Style | Telling | Asking |
| Speed | Fast, in the moment | Slower, scheduled |
| Goal | Correct or reinforce | Build capacity & ownership |
| Sounds like | "Here's what I saw..." | "What do you think is getting in the way?" |
| In Paylocity | Journal → Note | Journal → Employee Check-In |
Scenario 1: Riley has been absent 3 Mondays in a row with no PTO requests.
Scenario 2: A team member made a racially offensive comment in the locker room.
Scenario 3: Casey hasn't completed the closing checklist consistently for two weeks.
Scenario 4: An SA told a new hire not to report a concern to HR.
An SA has been late twice this week — once 8 minutes, once 14 minutes — without calling ahead. The first session was short-staffed both times.
Your SBI:A cleaner made a comment to a co-worker about another team member's appearance that made the room noticeably uncomfortable. No members were present.
Your immediate next step:An ASM de-escalated a member complaint calmly, apologized without deflecting, and offered a comp session — all before you even knew there was an issue.
Your SBI:| Step | Action | Document In |
|---|---|---|
| First Instance | Coaching conversation + documentation | Paylocity → Performance Issue category → Employee Check-In |
| Second Instance | Written warning | Paylocity → Journals → call People first |
| Third Instance | Final written warning | Paylocity → Final Written Warning → call People first |
| Continued | May result in termination | Call People before any action |
| Situation | Use This |
|---|---|
| Great shift — SA crushed it | Journal → Note → share with employee |
| Coaching conversation just happened | Journal → Employee Check-In → add Regional |
| Attendance issue (first time) | Journal → Employee Check-In → Performance Issue category |
| Recurring performance pattern | Journal → Written Warning → call People first |
| Policy violation suspected | Call People FIRST — before documenting anything |
| Employee needs a performance plan | Journal → PIP Template → call People first |